("Quid coniuratio est?")
SHERMAN H. SKOLNICK vs. HILLARY RODHAM CLINTON
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS
EASTERN DIVISION
SHERMAN H. SKOLNICK and JOSEPH ANDREUCCETTI,
Plaintiffs, )
vs.
HILLARY RODHAM CLINTON; AMY ZISOOK; MARK ZISOOK;
H.C. VALENT;.JOHN E. GIERUM; GERALD H.
PARSHALL, Jr.; ROBERT ALEXOVICH; and ten JOHN
DOES and JANE ROES (whose identity is not now
known to plaintiffs),
Defendants. )
VERIFIED COMPLAINT.
Sherman H. Skolnick and Joseph Andreuccetti, plaintiffs, complain
against the defendants Hillary Rodham Clinton, Amy Zisook, Mark
Zisook, H.C. Valent, John E. Gierum, Gerald H. Parshall, Jr.,
Robert Alexovich, and ten John Does and Jane Roes (whose identity
is not now known to plaintiffs), and allege as follows:
Count One.
Sherman H. Skolnick and Joseph Andreuccetti plaintiffs, complaint
against the defendants Hillary Rodham Clinton, Amy Zisook, Mark
Zisook, H.C. Valent, John E. Gierum, Gerald H. Parshall, Jr.,
Robert Alexovich, and ten John Does and Jane Roes (whose identity
is not now known to the plaintiffs) and allege as follows:
(a) to obstruct the due course of justice as to plaintiffs, and to damage plaintiffs in their persons, properties, and federal constitutionally protected rights, privileges, and immunities, as hereinafter more fully set forth;
(b) to obstruct public disclosure and disclosure in official tribunals, by plaintiffs, of the secret details of the unlawful transfer of a 50 million dollar portion of 58.4 million dollars of funds of the Federal Home Loan Bank, parked and held in custody, and supposed to be so, with Household Bank and Household International in the Chicago area, and supposed to be held to make good the claims of plaintiff Andreuccetti.
(c) the use of said 50 million dollar unlawful transfer by defendant Hillary Rodham Clinton was to cover up 47 million dollars that was misappropriated and embezzled, and/or otherwise unlawfully encumbered, used, or removed from an Arkansas savings and loan, Madison Guaranty Savings and Loan, as to which defendant Hillary Rodham Clinton and her husband, William Jefferson Clinton, committed or caused to be committed, and allowed, permitted, and condoned, and acquiesced in, acts and doings punishable under provisions of the federal criminal code. Part of the scheme included for defendant Hillary Rodham Clinton to proceed to have acts and doings done against the plaintiffs, with said defendant pretending to have federal authority; that although said defendant occupies an office in the White House, she has no actual federal authority but was part of the scheme to pretend she did.
11. That in January, 1994, plaintiff Skolnick was sitting in his wheelchair in the hallway of one of the floors of the site of the federal courts in Chicago, the Dirksen Federal Building, 219 South Dearborn St., Chicago, IL 60604. Defendant John E. Gierum came up to plaintiff Skolnick and insisted on talking to plaintiff about certain matters that were bothering said defendant. At the time, the defendant appeared highly rattled and agitated. In a few moments, plaintiff Skolnick and defendant Gierum were joined by plaintiff Andreuccetti who was coming from parking his vehicle.
Defendant Gierum told plaintiffs that he was closely aligned with defendant Hillary Rodham Clinton, being from the same Chicago suburb of Park Ridge as the Rodham family and having gone to law school with her brother. Defendant Gierum, pointing to plaintiff Skolnick, said to plaintiffs, "If you are correct, as you seem to be, what have I been doing the last ten years?", meaning to be understood by defendant Gierum and was so understood by plaintiffs, that defendant Gierum was then and there confirming that plaintiffs are correct about the very high level corruption, obstruction of justice as to plaintiffs, is true and correct, and that Gierum knows about the unlawful matters as herein and hereinafter set forth and that Gierum has gone along with such corruption and is a part of the same.
12. Thereafter, on the same day in January, 1994, the discussion between plaintiffs and defendant Gierum resumed outside the Park Ridge law offices of defendant Gierum. Said defendant came out of his office and sat in the front seat of plaintiff Andreuccetti's vehicle; Gierum sat next to Skolnick and Andreuccetti sat right behind them. Then and there defendant Gierum admitted and confessed, as follows, including but not limited to:
(a) that defendant Hillary Rodham Clinton and the Clinton White House are trying to frame Gierum and send him to prison by way of blaming Gierum for the unlawful transfer of the said 50 million dollars, as hereinbefore described.
(b) That because of very high level corruption, defendant Gierum would not be able to defend himself, irrespective of the law and the facts that might otherwise protect him or support his position.
(c) Whereupon, plaintiff Skolnick said to defendant Gierum, "John, you seem to be a skilled attorney; you can beat the rap." Defendant Gierum responded, "No, I can't. It's fixed. I'll no doubt be calling you from a faraway jail." Whereupon, defendant Gierum had tears in his eyes as he began talking of his young child that depends on him and that in jail he would not be able to take care of that child. "They'll frame their own mother", defendant Gierum said in anguish, meaning defendant Hillary Rodham Clinton and her husband. That despite his admissions and confession, Gierum was a participant in said unlawful transfer.
13. That thereafter, as known to defendant Gierum, and as known to defendant Hillary Rodham Clinton, plaintiff Skolnick made numerous public mentions of the matters as in paragraphs 12, (a) through (c) inclusive, and for some two years after January, 1994, defendant Gierum did not dispute or challenge the same. That the matter was referred to in court by plaintiff Andreuccetti, and defendant Gierum did not challenge or dispute it there either.
14. That in furtherance of the scheme, as hereinbefore mentioned, defendant Hillary Rodham Clinton, by and through defendant Gerald H. Parshall, Jr., on February 16, 1995, did, caused to be done, committed, allowed, permitted, and condoned, and acquiesced in the following:
(a) that for the purposes of said hereinbefore described scheme, defendant Parshall, acting for defendant Hillary Rodham Clinton, and Parshall purporting to be a Clinton Justice Department official, flew in to Chicago, and threatened, coerced, and terrorized plaintiffs Skolnick and Andreuccetti in a hallway outside Courtroom 1858, Dirksen Federal Building, Chicago, Illlinois, as follows:
(b) That in a menacing and threatening voice, defendant Parshall said to plaintiffs Skolnick and Andreuccetti, while Parshall was pointing to Skolnick sitting in his wheelchair, that Parshall was going to meet privately with Chief Bankruptcy Judge John D. Schwartz, to get Schwartz to jail Skolnick to stop Skolnick from investigating and making public statements relating to the hereinbefore described scheme and certain matters admitted to and confessed by an Internal Revenue official of the Criminal Investigation Division as hereinafter set forth. Meaning to be understood by defendant Hillary Rodham Clinton by and through defendant Parshall, and so understood by plaintiffs, that defendant Hillary Rodham Clinton, by and through her confederate defendant Parshall, was going to ex parte and privately get Schwartz to misuse his federal authoriity , to arbitrarily and without authority or jurisdiction over Skolnick, to jail Skolnick, to stop Skolnick from investigating and publicly disclosing matters relating to the hereinbefore dsscribed scheme by defendants.
(c) then and there clearly visible to defendant Parshall, acting for and on behalf of defendant Hillary Rodham Clinton, was that plaintiff Skolnick is a helpless, paraplegic invalid in a wheelchair. That the acts and doings of defendant Hillary Rodham Clinton, by and through defendant Parshall, were done to terrorize plaintiff Skolnick and coerce plaintiff Andreuccetti standing right next to Skolnick's wheelchair, and did so terrorize and coerce plaintiffs.
(d) That U.S. Magistrate Joan H. Lefkow who occupies said Courtroom 1858, and her deputy clerk overheard said threats, terror, and coercion directed against plaintiffs in the hallway. The deputy clerk of said Magistrate came to the door and stated, "We inside (meaning her and the Magistrate) can hear everything you are saying. Please move away from this doorway". At the time, Magistrate Lefkow was being manipulated by defendant Hillary Rodham Clinton and defendant Parshall, in that the husband of defendant Hillary Rodham Clinton had just prior thereto appointed Lefkow to be a U.S. District Judge, and said appointment was being manipulated by a top Justice Department official, Sheila Foster Anthony, sister of Clinton White House deputy counsel Vincent W. Foster, Jr., who died mysteriously in July, 1993.
As known to defendants Hillary Rodham Clinton and Parshall, plaintiff Skolnick as a commentator had made public statements that defendant Hillary Rodham Clinton and the Clinton Justice Department were covering up what Skolnick and others believed was the murder of Foster.
15. That on or about April, 1995, defendant Hillary Rodham Clinton flew in to Chicago to appear on the Oprah TV Show, telecast out of Chicago for nationwide distribution. That said defendant, in describing plaintiff Skolnick, said that Skolnick's comments have to be blocked. By words, phrases, and statements, said defendant stated plaintiff is an evil person and should be obstructed in what he is doing. Meaning to be understood by said defendant, and so understood by plaintiffs, that Skolnick's investigation of said hereinbefore described scheme, is to be obstructed by whatever means possible, even unlawful methods. That by said statements, said defendant confirmed and ratified that she was acting to terrorize and coerce plaintiffs, as hereinbefore described, by and through defendant Parshall and others. Defendant Hillary Rodham Clinton said in referring to plaintiff Skolnick as assisted in his TV Show by plaintiff Andreuccetti, that there is a person in this town (meaning Chicago) doing a TV about me (meaning Hillary) who has to be stopped. Meaning plaintiffs are to be "enemies of the state" on an "enemies list".
16. That defendants Hillary Rodham Clinton and Parshall were in a position to know that Chief Judge Schwartz was the very one they could use to seek to misuse his federal authority to falsely jail Skolnick, to stop plaintiff Skolnick from investigating, with plaintiff Andreuccetti, and by terror to block Skolnick's said TV program referred to by defendant Hillary Rodham Clinton, the hereinbefore described scheme. On or about December, 1994, Judge Schwartz addressed all the lawyers and other persons then and there in his court, as follows:
"That man in the wheelchair, Sherman Skolnick. I don't want to find out that any of you watch or pay any attention to his television show." Which was meant as a warning to lawyers and other persons that come into the courthouse, that something bad will happen to them if they dared to watch Skolnick's Monday evening program "Broadsides" on public access Cable TV in Chicago and some suburbs.
17. That shortly after the matters with defendant Gierum, as in paragraphs 12 through 12(c) inclusive, preceding, plaintiff Skolnick discussed the Gierum matter on Skolnick's recorded phone commentary and on Skolnick's public access Cable TV Show. Also, plaintiff Skolnick assisted with a story about what Gierum said in a one million circulation newspaper in Germany.
18. Whereupon, defendant Hillary Rodham Clinton, under the pretense of federal authority but without actual authority to do so, put plaintiffs Skolnick and Andreuccetti on a so-called "enemies list", to be targeted by the Internal Revenue Service, the Federal Bureau of Investigation, and other state and federal agencies, without any basis in law or in fact to warrant or authorize said plaintiffs to be so targeted.
19. Up to about October, 1994, defendant Amy Zisook was a consultant in the White House to defendant Hillary Rodham Clinton and to her husband, the President; and acting in an advisory and other capacities for and on behalf of Household Bank and Household International in respect to the Gierum matter, as in paragraphs 12 through 12 (c) inclusive, preceding, and in furtherance of the scheme as hereinbefore described.
20. On or about July, 1994, defendant Mark Zisook in furtherance of the matter in paragraph 19 preceding, and in furtherance of having plaintiffs on the said "enemies list"; and in furtherance of the scheme hereinbefore described; that defendant Mark Zisook, under the cover of being a purported insurance salesman, obtained entrance into the private residence in Bensenville, Illinois, a Chicago suburb, of plaintiff Andreuccetti and his wife Noemi. Under the pretense of purporting to seek to sell plaintiff insurance, defendant Mark Zisook proceeded to grill plaintiff Andreuccetti and his wife, as to their business, as to their family, as to their life style, as to matters that relate to their politics, and what plaintiff knows about defendant Hillary Rodham Clinton.
Defendant Mark Zisook, describing to plaintiff, regarding defendant Amy Zisook, called her "my sister", and said that shortly "my sister has to leave the White House because it is a sinking ship", a statement calculated to elicit data from plaintiff Andreuccetti as to the hereinbefore described unlawful secret transfer of 50 million dollars implicating Household Bank and Household International and defendant Hillary Rodham Clinton and others, as in paragraph 10 through 10(c) inclusive, preceding; and as to Household, with plaintiff Andreuccetti not knowing at the time that defendant Mark Zisook's relative, defendant Amy Zisook, has been in an advisory capacity to Household and in other capacities with them.
That defendant Mark Zisook found some way to conduct himself and the conversation, that he stayed many hours at the private residence of plaintiff Andreuccetti. Said defendant while purporting to sympathize with the viewpoints of plaintiff as to defendant Hillary Rodham Clinton; that defendant Mark Zisook acted that way by way of extracting from plaintiff data having nothing whatever to do with the selling to plaintiff purported insurance.
21. That the acts and doings of defendant Amy Zisook, by and through defendant Mark Zisook, were in furtherance of defendant Hillary Rodham Clinton having plaintiffs Andreuccetti and Skolnick on said "enemies list", to target plaintiffs for espionage and to find some way to coerce them.
22. That a scheme related to that in paragraphs 10 through 10(c) preceding was the following:
(a) that top officials of the Internal Revenue Service in Chicago set about to steal for their own personal use and benefit, millions of dollars of properties, called Kingspoint Condominiums, in Addison, Illinois, a Chicago suburb, rightfully belonging to plaintiff Andreuccetti;
(b) that said officials had the blessings and connivance of Robert Cesca, acting inspector general of the U.S. Treasury, described by law enforcement officers that Cesca is the highest mafia representative in the U.S. government. That Cesca has arranged to conceal official documents that incriminate defendants including Hillary Rodham Clinton and her husband.
(c) that for the purposes of so stealing plaintiff Andreuccetti's valuable properties, said top IRS officials were in a position to blackmail Chicago Chief Federal Bankruptcy Judge John D. Schwartz, in that Schwartz had been a director of First National Bank of Cicero which through a fraud, pushed plaintiff Andreuccetti into involuntary bankruptcy; that Schwartz put himself in charge of all matters purporting to relate to plaintiff Andreuccetti, including state court litigation over which Schwartz had no lawful jurisdiction. Further, another blackmail point against Schwartz was that he apparently had not filed any proper income tax in thirty years. And still further, that Schwartz had over 140 million dollars parked offshore in his name.
(d) Moreover, an additional blackmail point of said top IRS officials to work a corrupt and malign influence on Judge Schwartz to their benefit, to the benefit of Household International and Household Bank, and to the great detriment of plaintiff Andreuccetti, was that the financial affairs of Judge Schwartz were interwoven with a strange purported Cadillac dealer, Emil Denemark, interwoven with Marcinkus, the Vatican Bank, and First National Bank of Cicero.
(e) That the top IRS officials allowed, permitted, condoned, approved of, and acquiesced in, that a purported Bankruptcy Trustee, Jay Steinberg, linked to Household International and Household Bank, caused to be filed in the name of plaintiff Joseph Andreuccetti, false and fraudulent income tax forms and returns, without the knowledge or permission of plaintiff Joseph Andreuccetti. Among other things, by said false and fraudulent forms and returns, the top IRS officials, aided by Steinberg, covered up a 900 hundred thousand dollar to one and one half million dollar embezzlement to the damage of plaintiff Andreuccetti.
(f) that said top IRS officials, aided by Robert Cesca, acting inspector general of the U.S. Treasury, and according to law enforcement personnel, the highest ranking mafia representative in the U.S. government, have covered up the theft of plaintiff Andreuccetti properties for their own personal use and benefit, by causing the land titles of the same to disappear. That to cover up the unawful transfer and other related matters, that tend to incriminate defendant Hillary Rodham Clinton and her husband, that Cesca and his confederates have concealed documents relating to Hillary and Bill Clinton and relating to matters herein of high-level corruption of top officials of IRS in stealing plaintiff Andreuccetti's valuable property for their own personal benefit.
23. That in furtherance of the said scheme, and to coerce and terrorize plaintiff Andreuccetti, defendants Hillary Rodham Clinton, John E. Gierum, and Gerald H. Parshall, Jr., acting jointly and severally, and in concert with one another, caused, approved of, condoned, and acquiesced in the following:
(a) That on May 13, 1996, defendant H.C. Valent came to the private residence of plaintiff Andreuccetti, in the Chicago suburb of Bensenville, Illinois, and then and there in a loud, threatening, and menacing voice, said to plaintiff Andreuccetti's wife, Noemi, to wit:
"You and your husband are criminals and I am going to confiscate all your furniture and your clothes, and all these vehicles near your house" meant by said defendant to cause great stress and anguish to plaintiff Andreuccetti recuperating from a triple bypass open heart operation, by so terrorizing plaintiff's wife; and did so cause plaintiff great terror, stress, and anguish.
That defendant H.C. Valent did these acts and doings under the sham and pretense of being a purported Revenue Officer of the Internal Revenue Service, but without actual authority to do so; but done under the sham and pretense of federal authority and while defendant Valent in a loud and threatening voice and menacing gestures repeatedly pushed her purported badge into the face of plaintiff's wife.
24. That this was caused to be done by defendant Hillary Rodham Clinton putting plaintiffs on the aforesaid "enemies list"; to obstruct the due course of justice as to plaintiffs; to coerce and terrorize plaintiff Andreuccetti with the defendants knowing that plaintiff Andreuccetti assists plaintiff Skolnick in various ways as to the aforementioned public access Cable TV Show, such as plaintiff Andreuccetti transporting the cable tapes, such as plaintiff Andreuccetti transporting plaintiff Skolnick who is a paraplegic and needs a wheelchair and special handling to get around; such as plaintiff Andreuccetti aiding and assisting Skolnick as a crusader as previously described.
25. That many of the aforementioned acts and doings were caused because the plaintiffs obtained the following confessions and admissions:
26. That on September 20, 1994, Plaintiff Sherman H. Skolnick and plaintiff Joseph Andreuccetti went to the 14th floor of the Kluczynski Building, headquarters in Chicago of the Internal Revenue Service, at 230 South Dearborn Street, Chicago, Illinois. Plaintiffs there went to the Internal Revenue Service, Criminal Investigation Division. Skolnick said he is a journalist and wishes to speak with the Chief or acting Chief of C.I.D.
27. A woman came to a door, said she speaks for the Chief, later identifying herself as Lynette Redmer, and ushered Skolnick and Andreuccetti to a conference room.
28. Skolnick stated that he is a journalist, gave his card, and stated he is head of "Hotline News" and participant of a TV Cable Show, "Broadsides", and founder/chairman, Citizen's Committee to Clean Up the Courts. He stated he is there with Andreuccetti, hereinafter "Joe", to report corruption, involving, among other things, corruption of U.S. Bankruptcy Trustee Jay Steinberg.
29. Skolnick told her that Steinberg, in the name of Joe, has been preparing, and causing to be prepared, and causing to be filed, false and fraudulent federal tax forms and returns, without the knowledge or permission of Joe.
30. That Steinberg has concealed that there was a 900 Thousand Dollar embezzlement involving Christian Henning, Jr., nephew/godson of Bishop Paul Marcinkus, recent head of the Vatican Bank. That Henning falsely stated that he was a partner of Joe. That Joe was falsely and fraudulently put into involuntary bankruptcy in 1984, still pending, by, among other things, a purported loan to him by First National Bank of Cicero. That Joe never received said funds which instead were applied by Henning and others for other purposes. That said Bank has been dominated by Henning's Uncle, Paul Marcinkus, until recently head of the mafia-dominated Vatican Bank. That Henning had corrupted the U.S. Attorney's office in Chicago, including but not limited to Assistant U.S. Attorney William R. Hogan, Jr., now on administrative leave because of charges of misconduct. Result: that Henning escaped adequate punishment.
31. Ms Redmer, by words and statements, showed that she already knew and knew much about much of the foregoing, and did not dispute Skolnick's recital of said facts and confirmed that Hogan took bribes in civil and criminal matters, to protect Household International, as in the federal prosecution in Chicago, of U.S. vs. John Best.
32. By words and statements, in discussion with Skolnick, Ms Redmer confirmed that her agency was having difficulty in an apparent tax evasion case being put together against Hogan. She confirmed that the difficulty was that Hogan was making charges, by way of rebuttal and blackmail, that upwards of six federal judges in Chicago were corrupt and took bribes, including but not limited to Judge James F. Holderman, Judge Marvin E. Aspen, Suzanne B. Conlon, and Chief Bankruptcy Judge John D. Schwartz.
33. That Ms Redmer was already fully aware of circumstances and details regarding Joe having been the owner of Kingspoint Condominiums, in Addision, Illinois. She was aware and confirmed that Robert Belavia together with Wallace Lieberman had stolen said property; that Lieberman on other occasions was a U.S. Bankruptcy auctioneer, that Belavia is a long-known mobster previously having apparent government immunity.
34. She was aware that FBI agent Mike "Chuckie" Peters, who she knows, has been accused of murdering or arranging the murder of Lieberman near the First National Bank of Cicero, just before Christmas, 1991.
35. She stated she worked on the Belavia case, and that higher ups, in her agency, who she understood to be corrupt, were anxious to have Belavia prosecuted on some offense, to get him out of the way.
36. By words and statements, she confirmed that top officials of her agency, on the next higher level, have corruptly taken as their own personal property, the said Kingspoint Condominiums properties; and confirmed that this was aided and abetted by Edward J. Lesniak, Household International, First National Bank of Cicero, among others.
37. By words and statements she confirmed that said corrupt doings by the higher-ups in her agency, were accomplished by having the land titles and related records as to Kingspoint, to disappear, to be unavailable by alleged computer so-called "glitches", and other devices of concealment of ownership.
38. By words and statements, she confirmed that she recognized that Chief Bankruptcy Judge in Chicago John D. Schwartz in Joe's long-standing case, was highly corrupt. She did not deny or dispute that Judge Schwartz has a net worth of 140 million dollars and has not filed a proper federal tax return in thirty years. She cautioned Skolnick that it was improper for him, "to have those records", of her agency.
39. She confirmed that she was aware of the facts of corruption at the highest level in the IRS in Chicago, as detailed about Chicago and Los Angeles in a Congressional Report in 1990 by Cong. Doug Barnard. She said, "Let's deal with Chicago -- don't tell me about L.A."
40. She confirmed that she was aware that the higher ups in her agency were secret and silent partners in at least two mafia-owned vending companies in Chicago Heights. That said corrupt IRS officials were aiding the mafia people to elude and escape IRS problems.
41. She confirmed that her higher ups, who she knew and understood to be corrupt, were allowing, permitting, and condoning, various corrupt Bankruptcy Trustees, not just Jay Steinberg in Joe's matter, to file false and fraudulent federal tax returns and details; by way of concealing the plundering of bankrupt estates and money laundering the proceeds, or even putting persons and firms not actually bankrupt into the bankruptcy court to be plundered.
42. She then and there said, "What is the point of you and me talking about all this when those higher up than me in IRS are corrupt? What's the point of me even making a report?" Skolnick answered that his contacts in the building will watch to see how the higher ups in her building are going to try to cover up my complaint. She said, to Skolnick, "Do you have contacts in C.I.D.?" He said, "You can presume that."
43. She used words and statements to show she had inside knowledge of Joe's problem. She referred to a 54 or more million dollar fund parked by Resolution Trust Corporation with Household International, part of the details of Joe's various pieces of litigation. Turning to Joe, she said, "Well , your claim against the fund is mostly 32 million dollars punitive damage claim from your DuPage matter", which Joe disputes. She said, "The transfer (secretly ) of 50 million dollars to Little Rock, that was Whitewater, right?" Skolnick confirmed that is correct. "They only needed 47 (million) down there, what happened to the 3 million difference?" Confirming that she knew from inside details that the President and First Lady are accused by some in R.T.C. of being implicated in the embezzlement of 47 million dollars missing from Madison Guaranty Savings & Loan of Little Rock. "Do you know exactly where in a secret trust they have the 50 million in Little Rock?" she said to Skolnick who said, "The 3 milllion difference is for so-called 'transportation' expense, that is, street tax." She was aware that John E. Gierum was implicated in said transfer and was a close crony of the First Lady Hillary Rodham Clinton.
44. She discussed with Skolnick and Joe, a firm known as Glenrock Co., secretly owned by Chicago Mayor Richie Daley and his business crony Jeremiah Joyce. Skolnick said to her, "I notice you are not writing down anything about Glenrock." She answered, "That's the Rostenkowski matter -- I can't go into that."
45. She confirmed that she knew and was aware that Glenrock, a multimillion dollar operation in Northlake, Illinois, Brookfield, Wisconsin, and Indianapolis, Indiana, did not keep proper records for IRS and did not pay their proper income tax, and confirming that the corruption was "wired all the way to the (IRS) Commissioner" in Washington, D.C.
46. That after a discussion between Skolnick, Joseph Andreuccetti, and the said Lynette Redmer, speaking as she said for the Chief of C.I.D., for some hour and a half, she stood up. As she did, Skolnick said to her, "Tell me straight in front, is everything said by the three of us the truth -- you, me , and Joe? Do you already know it to be the truth?" Whereupon, she answered, "It is the truth, everything said in this room is the truth", and she ushered Sherman H. Skolnick and Joseph Andreuccetti out of the room and toward the elevator.
47. That the scheme, as in pararaphs 10 through 10(c), preceding, for the unlawful transfer of 50 million dollars portion of 58.4 million dollars of funds of the Federal Home Loan Bank, parked with Household Bank and Household International in the Chicago area, and supposed to be held to make good the claims of plaintiff Andreuccetti; said transfer was in three legs or three steps, including but not limited to, as follows:
(a) from the Chicago area, to Little Rock, Arkansas;
(b) from Arkansas, disguised as purported funds of Arkansas Development Finance Authority, wired by way of Fuji Bank to the Cayman Islands;
(c) and from there disguised as funds relating to purported insurance transactions, sent or wired to secret coded accounts in Switzerland, for the benefit of defendant Hillary Rodham Clinton under the code "Chelsea Jefferson".
48. Referring to the second leg or second step of the same, are the remarks of Congressman Dan Burton (R., Indiana), on May 29, 1996:
"ADFA [Arkansas Development Finance Authority] was created by Governor Clinton in 1985 to provide economic development loans in Arkansas. In December of 1988, ADFA deposited $50 million in a Japanese bank in the Cayman Islands. I have a copy of the contract that I will enter into the record. I have also delivered a copy of this document to the Independent Counsel's office. Why would an economic development agency in Arkansas deposit $50 million in a bank in the Cayman Islands? The Cayman Islands are a well-known center of money laundering for drug dealers. The State Department's international narcotics control report described the Caymans as 'a haven for money laundering'".
And also: "One of the questions that I think is very, very important is why did the Arkansas Development Financial Authority send $50 million of Arkansas money to the Cayman Islands to deposit in a bank in the Cayman Islands, which is a major drug transit point acknowledged by almost every DEA agent in the world?" And also: "I have the electronic bank transfer statements in my office. I am going to put them in the Congressional Record. There is no doubt the money was wired to the Cayman Islands. The question needs to be asked, why was it wired? Why would the Governor of Arkansas allow that?" Congressional Record, 5/29/96, H5627-28.
49. Like the plaintiffs in the instant case, Cong. Burton apparently is also on some "enemies list" of defendant Hillary Rodham Clinton. As a consequence the Congressman apparently has been coerced into not following through on his promise to put the documents into the congressional Record and a promise he made, "Tomorrow night, since I am out of time now, Mr. Speaker, I will go into more detail on the $50 million that was Arkansas money that was transferred to the Cayman Islands, a major transit point for drug trafficking in this hemisphere."
50. The aforementioned unlawful transfer of the said 50 million dollars was for the benefit of defendant Hillary Rodham Clinton and to the great damage and detriment of plaintiff Andreuccetti.
51. On June 13, 1996, plaintiffs Skolnick and Andreuccetti met with defendant Robert Alexovich who alleges he is a "revenue officer, Internal Revenue Service". Related to said defendant were the details as in paragraph herein preceding 23(a), adopted here by reference as if verbatim here set forth. Defendant Alexovich said it was unlawful for defendant H.C. Valent to do such acts and doings, but defendant Alexovich said to plaintiffs, "That did not happen". Yet, defendant Alexovich has no personal knowledge of said event and could not know whether it did or did not happen.
52. Defendant Alexovich told plaintiffs that he did not know of the matters as in preceding paragraphs herein 10 (a) through (c) inclusive, 22 through 22(f) inclusive, 25 through 46 inclusive, all adopted herein by reference as if verbatim here set forth. Yet, prior to said meeting on June 13, 1996, defendant Alexovich had in his custody and possession documents, papers, and records by plaintiffs as to said matters. In his statements defendant made false declarations, knowingly so, in furtherance of the schemes as hereinbefore set forth.
53. After the said June 13, 1996, defendant Alexovich supplied to plaintiff Andreuccetti false and misleading data calculated to aid and abet the higher ups at the Internal Revenue Service in having stolen, for their own personal use and benefit, the valuable properties of plaintiff Andreuccetti.
(a) that in response to plaintiff Andreuccetti's complaint that Bankruptcy Trustee Jay Steinberg filed false and fraudulent forms and returns in the name of plaintiff Joseph Andreuccetti, defendant Alexovich sent plaintiff a note stating, "here are some of the records of filing you requested re: the billing statement you submitted," with various sheets showing only zeroes and containing the statement "return not present for this account"; thus evading records, known to said defendant, of an embezzlement of between 900 thousand dollars and one and a half million dollars which damaged plaintiff, as known to said defendant, and should have been therein shown.
(b) that in so doing, by all his acts and doings, defendant Alexovich sought to unlawfully cover up that a form 211 by plaintiff Andreuccetti was falsely rejected, with the statements: "William & Hillary Clinton et al." and "(1) recovery was too small to warrant payment of reward. (2) Information was previously known to the Service or available in public records readily accessible to the Service. (3) Information furnished did not cause investigation."
A copy of said alleged response to plaintiff's form 211 is attached hereto and made a part hereof; and a copy attached and made a part hereof of said form 211, being an Application for Reward for Original Information.
54. That defendant Robert Alexovich did these acts and doings under the sham and pretense of being a purported and alleged Revenue Officer of the Internal Revenue Service, but without actual authority to commit, condone, cause to be done, and acquiesce in, said acts and doings; but done under the sham and pretense of federal authority, in furtherance of the schemes hereinbefore set forth. That defendants Alexovich and Valent have filed and caused to be filed, false papers and documents calling for the seizure of property of plaintiff Andreuccetti.
55. That acts and doings were done, caused to be committed, allowed, permitted, and condoned, and acquiesced in, by ten defendants being John Does and Jane Roes whose identity is not now know to the plaintiffs all in furtherance of the schemes and acts and doings hereinbefore set forth.
56. That defendants, each of them, individually, severally, jointly, and in concert, and aiding and abetting one another, have by their foregoing acts and doings against plaintiffs, have deprived plaintiffs Skolnick and Andreuccetti of federal constitutionally protected rights, privileges, and immunities, including but not limited to the following:
(a) Under the First Amendment, the right of plaintiffs to gather news and inquire into wrongdoing by defendants and persons acting with them, including persons and officials in high position and places; with the right of plaintiffs not to be damaged in their persons and properties while so doing, by the acts and doings unlawfully done by defendants.
(b) Violation of plaintiffs' rights under the First Amendment in that "Congress shall make no law respecting...the right of the people...to petition the Government for a redress of grievances". As hereinbefore set forth, the defendants have obstructed the due course of Justice, unlawfully damaging plaintiffs in their persons and properties, while plaintiffs are involved in petitioning the Government for a redress of grievances.
(c) Under the Fourth Amendment, "The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated..." The right of plaintiffs not to be spied on including the right not to be spied on inside their private residences by persons acting for others in high places, like for defendant Hillary Rodham Clinton; done under the sham and pretense of authority but without actual authority to do the acts and doings hereinbefore complained of.
(d) Violating the Fifth Amendment, the defendants have interfered with the liberty of plaintiffs and deprived plaintiffs of property without due process of law.
(e) The acts and doings of defendants violate plaintiffs' rights under the U.S . Constitution, Article I, section 9, clause 3, "No Bill of Attainder or ex post facto Law shall be passed". Defendants have caused plaintiffs to be designated as "criminals", to be threatened in their liberty, persons, and properties, as "enemies of the state" and put on defendants' "enemies list".
57. That plaintiffs Skolnick and Andreuccetti have been damaged in the amount of One Hundred Million Dollars.
58. Wherefore, plaintiffs Sherman H. Skolnick and Joseph Andreuccetti ask damages against the hereinbefore named defendants, and each of them, of One Hundred Million Dollars and costs and fees as provided by law, and such other and further relief as plaintiffs may be entitled to under the circumstances.
COUNT TWO.
----------
Plaintiffs Skolnick and Andreuccetti complain against the defendants as all named in Count One, and allege as follows:
1-55 inclusive as in Count One, adopted herein by reference as if verbatim here in set forth.
56. That defendants, each of them, individually, jointly, and severally, and in concert, have caused and are causing the circulation of data contending that plaintiffs are as follows:
(a) that plaintiffs Skolnick and Andreuccetti are members of or supporters of Posse Comitatus and are in the category of what is known as "domestic terrorists"; and as such, that these plaintiffs are dedicated to and actually do, damage and injure public officials in their person and property;
(b) that plaintiffs Skolnick and Andreuccetti use, cause to be used, instigate or foment the use of, Federal Land Patent procedures to damage and injure public officials in their person and property.
(c) that plaintiffs are so-called "illegal tax protectors" and/or foment said movement; that said plaintiffs actively engage in the same or make a business of taking cash and other valuable goods and services, for plaintiffs' personal use, from members of said movement;
(d) that plaintiffs make and engage in a business and enterprise of arranging, fomenting, instigating and/or persuading other persons to form offshore trusts, for the purpose and apparent purpose of aiding and abetting persons to evade and circumvent the Laws of the United States;
(e) that plaintiffs are so-called "gun nuts and are trigger-happy persons, dangerous to the public welfare and actively aid and abet others as such, to the detriment of public officials, public welfare, domestic tranquilty, and national security; that these plaintiffs seek to do physical violence against the persons and properties of public officials;
(f) that plaintiffs bring lawsuits and administrative procedures to use the pendency of such, often belabored and purposely delayed, often long pendency of such, to carry out a secret agenda of blackmail directed against public officials and others; and to deter public officials from proceeding to prosecute plaintiffs for supposed crimes;
57. That defendants rely on such data as being true when, in fact, such data are completely false and have never been done or committed by plaintiffs. Defendants circulate such data knowing full well it is false.
58. That defendants cause a secret code to be attached to state and federal records labeling, identifying, and targetting plaintiffs and each of them, as in such data.
59. That defendants circulate such data in private, ex parte, and in secret, to public officials that in any way have cases and procedures effecting plaintiffs, so that there is an obstruction justice, damaging plaintiffs. A few of the many examples:
(a) such data was circulated to Chicago Federal District Judge George W. Lindberg, who had pending a case by plaintiff Andreuccetti seeking a remedy for fraudulently begotten judgments, corruptly obtained by opponents of said plaintiff corrupting John D. Schwartz. Based on such false data, Judge Lindberg identified plaintiff Andreuccetti as "Posse Comitatus", denied him all relief as an "enemy of the state" and called plaintiff Andreuccetti's associate, plaintiff Skolnick, "a liar", even though Skolnick was neither a party to the litigation nor a sworn witness. Based on this, the way was opened to falsely seize, in November, 1993, plaintiff Andreuccetti's residence, without a valid writ, and to seize and steal Cable TV tapes known to be at said plaintiff's residence since he transports the same for the said show; and seizing and stealing all his books, papers, court records, financial records, and such, and carrying them away in a private vehicle under the sham and pretense of deputy sheriffs; said items have never been returned to said plaintiff.
(b) Based on this, federal law enforcement personnel follow plaintiff Skolnick around the Dirksen Building, site of the federal courts, as an alleged "domestic terrorist", interfering with Skolnick gathering news as an electronic journalist and moderator of "Broadsides" said public access Cable TV program; and interfering with Skolnick attending open court sessions as a spectator and journalist.
Plaintiffs ask the Court not to have to list here all the other examples known by plaintiffs, but if requested by the Court to do so, plaintiffs will give a more comprehensive list.
60. Re-alleged from Count One, as if verbatim here set forth, paragraphs 56, 56(a), 56(b), 56 (c), 56(d), and 56(e).
61. Realleged from Count One, as though verbatim here set forth paragraphs 57 and 58.
Count Three.
------------
Plaintiffs Skolnick and Andreuccetti complain against the defendants as all named in Count One, and allege as follows:
1-55 inclusive as in Count One, adopted by reference as if verbatim here set forth.
56. Re-alleged from Count Two, adopted by reference as if verbatim here set forth, paragraphs 56 through 60 inclusive. As to Bill of Attainder, re-allege from Count One, paragraph 56(e).
57. Re-alleged from Count One, adopted by reference as if verbatim here set forth paragraphs 57 and 58.
[signed] [signed]
Joseph Andreuccetti Sherman H. Skolnick
990 County Line Road 9800 So. Oglesby Ave.
Bensenville IL 60106 Chicago IL 606174870
(708) 860-9930 (312) 375-5741
Plaintiff, Pro Se Plaintiff, Pro Se
VERIFICATION OF COMPLAINT.
--------------------------
The undersigned under the penalties for perjury and provisions of 28 U.S.C.A. $ 1746, certify that the matters stated in the foregoing Verified Complaint, Counts One, Two, and Three, are true and correct to their personal knowledge, or are matters of record or of law, and in either case, are true. Executed on July 18, 1996.
[signed] [signed] Joseph Andreuccetti. Sherman H. Skolnick.
Views expressed do not necessarily reflect those
of Conspiracy Nation, nor of its Editor in Chief.
-----------------------------------------------------------------
I encourage distribution of "Conspiracy Nation."
For information on how to receive the improved Conspiracy Nation Newsletter, send an e-mail message to bigred@shout.net
See also: http://www.europa.com/~johnlf/cn.html
See also: ftp ftp.shout.net pub/users/bigred