("Quid coniuratio est?")
Here is the full context of remarks made by me in response to statements by Chip Berlet:
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
[...]
One last point: there was this guy, Michael Aquino, who was very upset that I had posted some material by Dave Emory in which Emory said some unflattering things about Mr. Aquino. You may know that Mr. Aquino reportedly claims to be "The Devil". Anyway, Mr. Aquino was all upset. So what did the mighty, so-called "Devil" do? Did he send his fiendish imps from Hell to torment me with hot pitchforks? No. The alleged "Devil" made noises (as are you) of libel, etc. So I thought to myself, "What kind of puny 'Devil' is this, that goes running to lawyers when he gets in a jam?" (And I also thought, "How can you defame someone who is supposedly going around saying that they are 'The Devil'?" If you've got someone that, allegedly, has claimed to be "The Devil", it seems to me that they have already pretty much "defamed" themselves as much as is possible.)
So you may wonder -- "But what does that have to do with me?" Answer: I have locked horns with "The Devil", buddy boy, and compared to him, you ain't sh**.
I encourage distribution of "Conspiracy Nation."
Coming to you from Illinois -- "The Land of Skolnick"