("Quid coniuratio est?")
THE ANDREUCCETTI AFFAIR
[...continued...]
[CN -- I am jumping ahead here, due to late breaking events of which I have just been informed.]
[CN -- Note also that I neither necessarily believe nor disbelieve either all or portions of the following. I am merely a journalist in this matter. I am willing to post replies of reasonable length from responsible parties.]
RECEIVED: Feb. 21, 1995
United States District Court
Northern District of Illinois
Eastern Division
Mark Sato, et al., plaintiffs )
) No. 92 C 7048
vs. )
) Judge Wayne Andersen
Shirley Peterson, et al., defendants ) Magistrate Joan Lefkow
Notice of Motion
Please be informed that on February 21, 1995, the undersigned filed with the Clerk of the above Court, and will present the same on April 20, 1995, at 10 a.m., before Magistrate Joan H. Lefkow, or any Magistrate or Judge sitting in her place and stead, in the Dirksen Federal Building, 219 So. Dearborn St., Chicago, IL 60604, the attached Motion for Leave with Further Amendments thereto attached of Second AMENDED Verified Complaint, and supporting Verification, and Verification set out below, all herewith served upon you.
Since the Magistrate stated on February 16, 1995, that she would rule by mail on pending motions for leave, it may not be necessary for these plaintiffs to present the attached Motion on the said April 20, 1995.
(signed) Joseph Andreuccetti
(signed) Sherman H. Skolnick
Verification including Proof of Service
The undersigned does hereby certify under the provisions of 28 U.S.CA. Sec. 1746, as follows:
Executed on February 21, 1995.
(signed) Joseph Andreuccetti
Motion for Leave to File Further Amendments to Second Amended Verified Complaint, with Further Amendments Attached
[CN -- As noted, I am skipping ahead. I hope to soon post the original complaint.]
Comes now Joseph Andreuccetti and Sherman H. Skolnick, plaintiffs, pro se, and move the Court for an Order granting them leave to file further amendments to Second Amended Verified Complaint, and for grounds state:
(signed) Joseph Andreuccetti, plaintiff, pro se (signed) Sherman H. Skolnick, plaintiff, pro se
Further Amendments to Second Amended Verified Complaint
Plaintiffs, pro se, Joseph Andreuccetti and Sherman H. Skolnick add the following to Count Three, following paragraph 29:
29D. That on February 16, 1995, at or about 10 a.m., there was a hearing in the instant case before Magistrate Judge Joan H. Lefkow. Present were: plaintiffs Sherman H. Skolnick, Joseph Andreuccetti, Robert E. Cleveland, Mark Sato, and Gerald H. Parshall, Jr., with Parshall representing the defendants; Parshall being from the United States Department of Justice, Tax Division, Trial Attorney, Washington, D.C.
29E. After said hearing, in the hallway outside Courtroom 1858, present were: Skolnick, Andreuccetti, Sato, and Cleveland, and Parshall. Parshall stated to plaintiffs Skolnick and Andreuccetti as follows:
(a) Parshall said he was going to go to Chief Bankruptcy Judge John D. Schwartz to tell him that plaintiffs Skolnick and Andreuccetti have made serious accusations against Schwartz, the same as in Count One, paragraph 13, adopted here by reference as if verbatim herein set forth, meaning to be understood by Parshall on behalf of defendants herein and was so understood by plaintiffs Skolnick and Andreuccetti as follows:
(1) That the defendants, by and through Parshall, are going to seek to force, compel, and coerce Judge Schwartz to mis-use his federal judicial power and authority, to threaten plaintiffs Skolnick and Andreuccetti with contempt and jail, to silence said plaintiffs and intimidate them into withdrawing and nullifying said paragraph 13 of Count One;
[CN -- Paragraph 13 of Count One: "By words and statements, she {CN -- Lynette Redmer, connected in some capacity with the IRS, Criminal Investigations Division} confirmed that she recognized that Chief Bankruptcy Judge John D. Schwartz, in Joe's {CN -- Andreuccetti's} long-standing case, was highly corrupt. She did not deny or dispute that Judge Schwartz has a net worth of 140 million dollars and has not filed a proper federal tax return in thirty years. She cautioned Skolnick that it was improper for him, 'to have those records,' of her agency.]
(2) That the defendants, by and through Parshall, are threatening to damage plaintiffs Skolnick and Andreuccetti, in their persons, properties, and liberties, if said plaintiffs repeat said serious accusations on the Cable Television Show "Broadsides", in which Skolnick is a regular panel commentator and Andreuccetti from time to time assists the same;
(3) That the defendants, by and through Parshall, are threatening to damage plaintiffs Skolnick and Andreuccetti, in their persons, properties, and liberties, by way of a Justice Department cover up of the 50 million dollar transfer of Resolution Trust Corporation funds, parked with Household International; that is, the clandestine transfer of said funds to Little Rock, Arkansas, to cover up the embezzlement and mis-appropriation of some 47 million dollars from a federally insured Savings and Loan in Arkansas, for which a federal grand jury is considering federal criminal indictments against Hillary Rodham Clinton and William Jefferson Clinton, respectively First Lady and President of the U.S.; further, the clandestine transfer from Little Rock with the assistance of Fuji Bank, to the Cayman Islands and from there to a purported clandestine account with the purported code Chelsea Jefferson in Switzerland; related to Count One herein, paragraph 18, adopted here by reference as if verbatim herein set forth;
(4) That the defendants, by and through Parshall, are threatening to damage plaintiff Andreuccetti in his person, property, and liberty, for him having filed a form 211 of IRS, attached to Second Amended Verified Complaint and adopted here by reference as if verbatim herein set forth;
(5) That the defendants, by and through Parshall, are threatening to damage plaintiffs Skolnick and Andreuccetti in their persons, properties, and liberties, in that defendants perceive that these plaintiffs caused the matters of Judge Schwartz, the clandestine transfer of RTC funds as aforesaid, on which Andreuccetti has a long-pending claim, and related IRS and Justice Department corruption, to be circulated and distributed worldwide on the information superhighway known as Internet; that these matters appeared on Internet just prior to the said February 16, 1995 hearing before Magistrate Lefkow at which Parshall was present on behalf of the IRS, the Justice Department, and other entities, official and unofficial, all of which have an interest to silence and damage these plaintiffs under the pretense of federal authority, damaging these plaintiffs in their persons, properties, and liberties;
(6) That the defendants, by and through Parshall, are seeking to damage plaintiffs Skolnick and Andreuccetti in their persons, properties, and liberties, in that defendants have the data to blackmail Judge John D. Schwartz to so damage these plaintiffs; in that Schwartz, as known to the defendants, is corruptly linked and implicated with the nefarious and corrupt acts and doings of Household International, Pinnacle Banc Group, as the successor and alter ego of the criminal enterprises known as Bank of Credit and Commerce International, First Midwest Bank, Bishop Paul Marcinkus, previously head of Vatican Bank and principal force behind Andreuccetti's tormentor First National Bank of Cicero now Pinnacle Banc Group, and Marcinkus having as his godson and or nephew Christian Henning, Jr., who falsely alleged he was Andreuccetti's business partner;
(7) That the defendants, by and through Parshall, know full well that Judge Schwartz is pliable and blackmailable by the defendants and could easily be compelled, coerced, and activated to jail plaintiffs Skolnick and Andreuccetti; defendants knowing full well Schwartz is implicated in RTC secret fund transfer.
(8) That the defendants, by and through Parshall, are conveying to plaintiffs Skolnick and Andreuccetti that the power of the Justice Department stands against said plaintiffs; that the Justice Department and the defendants could allow, permit, condone, and acquiesce in bodily harm and other damage to be inflicted on plaintiffs and that nothing could or would be done against the perpetrators; similar to the defendants and the Justice Department covering up and suppressing that the senior investigation specialist of the RTC, knowledgeable about the aforesaid 50 million dollar clandestine transfer, Jon Parnell Walker, was suicided, that is, murdered, and the Justice Department and the defendants have arranged that nothing be done to investigate the matter, up to the time of the appointment of the Independent Counsel; that the corruption of Judge Schwartz is linked to the secret transfer of 50 million dollars of RTC, as aforesaid, to try to keep Clinton and his wife from jail; that the corruption of Judge Schwartz is linked to Justice Department corruption in the INSLAW Affair where more than 41 witnesses were murdered while the matter was about to commence and/or pending before a Special Federal Grand Jury in Chicago; that Skolnick as a federal grand jury witness complained of said murders in a civil suit to no avail, with the Justice Department defendants covering up the same.
(9) That the defendants, by and through Parshall, meant it to be understood and it was so understood by plaintiffs Skolnick and Andreuccetti, that these plaintiffs should shut their mouths and watch what they are saying in and out of Court; in that as known to the defendants and the Justice Department, there is a secret unit there that carries out domestic and foreign political murders; as INSLAW contends.
[...to be continued...]
I encourage distribution of "Conspiracy Nation."
Coming to you from Illinois -- "The Land of Skolnick"