("Quid coniuratio est?")
L.J. DAVIS INTERVIEW
L.J. Davis, author of an article offering a good look beneath the surface of Arkansas politics ("The Name of Rose", The New Republic, April 4, 1994), was interviewed by phone by David Inge of the local PBS-connected radio station on August 4, 1994. What follows is my transcription of that interview.
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
[...continued...]
CALLER #2:
Well he [Brouton] does talk about CIA connections. It is in the
title. I forget...
L.J. DAVIS:
He does talk about CIA connections, and about... (sighs) I didn't
want to get on to this, but he too discovered some airports
that the CIA was apparently using -- one at Iron Mountain.
CALLER #2:
That's what I wanted to get to, was the Mena situation...
CALLER #2:
Yeah. Um-hmm [affirmative]. The under-reported story, I think, as
well as some of these details, is the... and one that annoys me
most about this "new Democrat" we have, is his willingness to aid
in the Contra war and wink at a lot of stuff that was going on.
Apparently the Gennifer Flowers revelation came from a guy who was disgruntled because he was "cut loose" and "left to twist in the wind" because he was in charge of the National Guard liaison with Oliver North's operation. {1}. Is that your understanding?
-+- Larry Nichols -+-
-+- Another "Good 'Ol Boy" -+-
Now what was goin' on at Mena, basically, was a cocaine operation being run by a guy, by a fat guy, named Barry Seal. Not the Black Panther [i.e. Bobby Seale] but another "good 'ol boy" who had once been one of the most talented pilots in TWA and the youngest man ever to certify to fly a 747.
And he was operating out of Mena under very considerable surveillance, interestingly, by the Arkansas State Police and the County Sheriff! The question we have to ask there is, whatever was going on at Mena (and we know that drugs were), once again -- How could the Governor of the state allow something like this to occur on his watch?? We've been talking about these complicated financial peccadillos and suspicious circumstances. They're a little hard to follow, but that's what I happen to specialize in. Here's a fairly simple and straightforward situation with C-123 cargo planes flying out at all hours of the night and bringing in all sorts of strange cargo!
CALLER #2:
And going down with arms, too. Right?
CALLER #2:
Flew out of Mena, right?
CALLER #2:
[Unclear] is it my recollection that you were roughed up? Who do
you attribute that to, if that's the case?
-+- Man Gets Lump On Head -+-
Now we did not report this because (1) we haven't got anything to report. Uh, "Man Gets Lump On Head. Cannot Remember How It Happened." That's not news. Somehow it got out anyway, and the whole situation was complicated when the Wall Street Journal mis-reported that four pages from my notebook were missing. Four pages from my notebook were not, and are not, missing.
CALLER #2:
At least you don't remember they were.
CALLER #2:
[Chuckles] Well, if you had amnesia it's hard to say, I suppose
though!
CALLER #2:
Well, I appreciate your work. And do be careful and...
-+- A Base Calumny -+-
I do, I'd like to go on record here in Illinois, however, as saying that I consider a base calumny has been uttered against me: it's been suggested that I can possibly get drunk on 4 drinks. That is to say, so drunk that I would go upstairs and hit myself over the head!
DAVID INGE:
And you want to deny that, categorically.
And we have 2 other people here we'll try to get to in the time that we have remaining. 333-WILL. 800-222-WILL.
Our next caller is on line number 2, in Eureka. Hello.
CALLER #3:
Good morning. Given the fact that politics seems to be an inter-
related web of mutual self-interests and that the media often
times emphasizes such "specks" and small little items -- Could it
be that there is more legitimate corruption that Mr. Clinton
(as you were just talking about in that story about Mena) has
engaged in that's not even come to the fore or will never even
get reported?
CALLER #3:
Well you were talking... Or say, the Stephens family and some of
the other shennanigans going on there.
[...to be continued...]
--------------------------<< Notes >>---------------------------- {1} Caller #2 seems to have a composite of Larry Nichols and Terry Reed (and possibly other(s)) in mind when he makes this statement. The person he attempts to describe has aspects of Reed ("liaison with Oliver North's operation") and Nichols ("the Gennifer Flowers revelation"). No blame to caller #2 for being confused, given the shoddy news coverage of Mena, etc. The fact that he even knows "the 'M' word" speaks well of him.
{2} Regarding Larry Nichols: I personally find him to be quite credible and have found nothing to make me think otherwise.
{3} With all respect to Mr. Davis, I think he is wrong here when he doubts the significance of the mortality rate (a.k.a. "body count") around Clinton. I think, at the least, it is statistically significant. You may recall a movie called "Executive Action". That movie, with a similar situation, hired an actuary to examine the statistical significance of so many deaths of potential witnesses related to the JFK assassination.
Note also that Mr. Davis does not tell us why he considers it a false line of inquiry. Is it perhaps because it is an area that gets a bit scarey to consider? With all respect to Mr. Davis, is he perhaps afraid to really look at it?
I encourage distribution of "Conspiracy Nation."
"Justice" = "Just us" = "History is written by the assassins."