("Quid coniuratio est?")
L.J. DAVIS INTERVIEW
L.J. Davis, author of an article offering a good look beneath the surface of Arkansas politics ("The Name of Rose", The New Republic, April 4, 1994), was interviewed by phone by David Inge of the local PBS-connected radio station on August 4, 1994. What follows is my transcription of that interview.
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
[...continued...]
DAVID INGE:
Again, our guest is L.J. Davis. He's a contributing editor to
Harpers magazine.
We'll go to the phones here, starting with a local caller, in Urbana, on line 1. Hello.
CALLER #1:
Hello. The rhetorical question you posed about Indonesians and
Pakistanis arriving in Urbana-Champaign probably didn't take a
good location. It probably wouldn't create much excitement here
because if Pakistanis and Indonesians aren't arriving every day,
they are, very, very frequently, along with Taiwanese, Koreans,
and mainland Chinese. So...
L.J. DAVIS:
Carrying bags of money, of course.
CALLER #1:
Uh, sometimes a fair amount, I should expect. At least the
Saudis.
But anyway... The question was good. I think, perhaps, the location wasn't.
But it seems to me, the case you're making is that there are a lot of muddy feet and not simply in the Clinton administration. There's more in the previous two administrations and that it's going to be very difficult to get Congress to come to pointing fingers.
CALLER #1:
Um-hmm. Yes, they have.
-+- A Fat Man in a Fez -+-
We haven't talked about the involvement of many of these same people, including Hillary Clinton's boss, in the first, billion dollar S&L failure in the country, which happened to occur in Pine Bluff, Arkansas, where all the world seemed to come together! You had the corrupt Prudential-Bache branch in Dallas involved. You had Bob Straus's law firm involved. You had the son of the mayor of Dallas involved. It was an incredible mess.
CALLER #1:
It still sounds to me as though this is a very pervasive
condition which doesn't affect a single administration but,
regrettably, sounds as though it affects everything during the
last 25 years!
-+- For a Long Time to Come -+-
One of the examples that I frequently use is that, before the regulations were hauled off to the knackers' yards -- starting in the Carter administration -- from the crash of '29 until the 1980s, there has been precisely one major stock scandal (that everybody forgets), the salad oil scandal, in the 1960s. Afterwards, everything went haywire.
Your point is an excellent one. We're gonna be recovering from this for a long time to come.
CALLER #1:
I agree with you, very much so.
How do we get back to the position of considering regulation not to be a dirty word?
CALLER #1:
This never happens, of course.
-+- A "Miraculous" Reappearance -+-
CALLER #1:
I really think we need to re-read the history of the period of
Teddy Roosevelt, and just preceding that, to see what we're
headed back for.
CALLER #1:
Yes.
CALLER #1:
Of course that's what set up the conditions that led to the
reforms of the liberal Republicans at the end of the century and
the beginning of this century.
CALLER #1:
Yeah. And in my home state, the LaFollettes...
CALLER #1:
...ultimately migrated to the Democrats.
Very good points! Thank you.
CALLER #2:
Yeah. The wider context: I'm wondering whether you're familiar
with the Houston reporter, Peter Brouton's(sp?) book, is that?
CALLER #2:
Right. And you've seen some of his clippings and some of his
articles and that sort of stuff?
His book, unfortunately, is, shall we say, "dense"?
CALLER #2:
Yeah. Yeah, I guess that's... I have not read it. I do know that
it has a title, and in the foreward, he says that he could easily
have put Lloyd Bentsen's name at the end of it, instead of George
Bush's, 'cause he's basically looking at underworld ties to S&L
failures in Texas. And both of those gentlemen are implicated
fairly well, I understand.
-+- "America's Switzerland" -+-
[...to be continued...]
--------------------------<< Notes >>---------------------------- {1} "They don't remember that it was ever different." Exactly. For many, having an obviously corrupt Presidency is normal. They have no memory of what it was like to have a President that (at least in theory) you could look up to. For those growing up today, what can they aspire to? To be like George Bush? To be like Bill Clinton?
I encourage distribution of "Conspiracy Nation."
"Justice" = "Just us" = "History is written by the assassins."