("Quid coniuratio est?")
FEDS ARE HIDING EVIDENCE IN BOMB TRIAL
"ARE WE CERTAIN THAT A FERTILIZER BOMB DID THE DIRTY WORK; OR WAS IT MERELY A COVER FOR WELL PLACED CHARGES WITHIN THE BUILDING?" -- Tom Valentine
[CN: With the OKC bombing(s) trial of Tim McVeigh going into its final phase, a puzzle is, Why didn't defense attorney Stephen Jones challenge the prevailing notion that a fertilizer bomb, and only a fertilizer bomb, brought down the Murrah Building? To challenge the fertilizer bomb truism, that it alone was the culprit, would not have necessitated any introduction of "dreaded" conspiracy theories -- so why did Jones ignore that aspect of the case? After all, it has not been proven that the so-called "fertilizer bomb" actually did all the damage on April 19, 1995; at least pointing that out, and even bringing expert witnesses to challenge the notion, would have helped McVeigh's defense. Stephen Jones may have a good reason for his silence regarding hard physical evidence which casts doubt on the "lone bomb theory"; time will tell.
The following article by Tom Valentine omits extensive quotes from attorney Stephen Jones' "writ of mandamus." If you'd like a copy of the entire 155-page writ, send a message to bigred@shout.net saying "send writ."]
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
(Excerpts from article by Tom Valentine)
In another sign of just how corrupt our federal government and its supporters within the major media have become, evidence continues to mount that the FBI and U.S. prosecutors in the Oklahoma City bombing case are guilty of the felony of "obstruction of justice."
What else can it be called?
Stephen Jones, attorney for Timothy McVeigh, filed a 155-page, carefully detailed brief supporting a Writ of Mandamus on March 25 and not a peep has been heard about this important document from the mainstream media.
The 10th District Court of Appeals denied the petition, stating simply that they agree with Judge Richard Matsch that the material should be "sealed."
Denying the accused access to documents held by the government, which would surely implicate many more perpetrators of the bombing and perhaps even an international plot, is certainly obstructing any opportunity for justice.
It has been more than two years since the death and destruction at the Alfred P. Murrah building rocked America. Two years without a trial, but with innumerable machinations of propaganda, demonization and emotional drama under the guise of "the most massive investigation ever."
When the trial finally began a few weeks ago, the federal government wasted opening day putting on witnesses to the tragedy and pain, who were irrelevant as to whether Timothy McVeigh may be the culprit as charged.
Judge Matsch, obviously playing his part in the seemingly scripted melodrama, allowed the irrelevant testimony. Defense attorney Jones, mindful of how it would look to object, did not do so.
The hyping of the irrelevant testimony merely shows how much more important the propaganda value is to the government case than the actual evidence.
-+- Evidence Destroyed -+-
In fact, within weeks of the bombing, the government used a pathetic "psychological" excuse to destroy the evidence of the bombed out building. Despite opposition to the blatant destruction of evidence, the government blasted the rest of the building into rubble, then carted the rubble away and buried it.
Any forensic examination is now impossible. Are we certain that a fertilizer bomb did the dirty work; or was it merely a cover for well placed charges within the building? Will we ever know?
In his detailed brief, Jones did not mention the FBI's use of coercion on witnesses who saw things the Feds don't wish to discuss, or the FBI's falsification of witness reports -- all of which has been covered by The Spotlight and Radio Free America [Valentine hosts the Radio Free America program; Sunday evenings, approx. 9-12 pm EST, 5.745 MHz shortwave.]
[Not included here: excerpts from Jones' Writ of Mandamus.]
-+- Exculpatory Evidence Denied -+-
Attorney Jones continues for more than 100 pages in his brief with much more exculpatory evidence, all of which has been denied and will not be admitted by Judge Richard Matsch who is well-known as an obedient "federal man" who does whatever the Justice Department wants him to, even if it concerns the real murderers of 168 people in the worst terrorist action ever seen in the United States.
From the day this petition was filed with the court, the major media was aware of it. Why have Americans been denied this news? The details revealed in the brief raise questions that require straight answers.
Views expressed do not necessarily reflect those
of Conspiracy Nation, nor of its Editor in Chief.
-----------------------------------------------------------------
I encourage distribution of "Conspiracy Nation."
For information on how to receive the improved Conspiracy Nation Newsletter, send an e-mail message to bigred@shout.net
See also: http://www.shout.net/~bigred/cn.html
See also: http://feustel.mixi.net
See also: ftp ftp.shout.net pub/users/bigred