("Quid coniuratio est?")
[From an interview with Linda Thompson on the For the People radio show, Feb. 11, 1994. Host is Chuck Harder.]
[Continued...]
ROGER [Telephone caller]: Do you have any opinions on the Vince Foster death?
LINDA THOMPSON: Sure. I've got an article that I wrote called "The Clinton Body Count."
CHUCK HARDER: Which, by the way, we are going to be publishing in an upcoming News Reporter {1}, folks.
THOMPSON: O.K. And that "Clinton Body Count" talks about people... I had a CIA researcher, who incidentally worked on the BBC [British Broadcasting Corp.] special on the Kennedy assassination, call me and tell me, "Do a body count around Clinton." And I said, "What do you mean?" And he said, "Well just look at how many people died while he was Governor that were around him, and how many have died since he became President." And I said, "O.K."
So I started researching newspaper databases to find articles. And the keywords that I used for the search were "dead" "die" "kill" "killed" "shot" "crash" -- things like that -- and "Clinton". All right? And I came up with all these people that were closely connected to Clinton. Twelve of them were his former bodyguards, in one capacity or another, including three of the guys that were killed at Mount Carmel in the Waco raid. Uh, they had been former Clinton bodyguards.
Now one point that's never come out about those 3 that were killed at Mount Carmel: All 3 of them had virtually identical wounds to the left temple. Um, so we have 25, no, 26 at this point, completely confirmed deaths around Clinton, none of them from natural causes, that have all been killed in either helicopter crashes, plane crashes. Uh, one person was killed in a skiing accident where he ran into a tree. (Now you know, Tony Danza just ran into a tree skiing the other day. And all he got was a skinned-up nose and a bumped head.) Well this guy was killed hitting a tree. Uh, a lady that used to be his [Clinton's] interpreter, a very attractive woman, had been his interpreter for several years, was in a one-car accident with no obvious cause, no witnesses.
Um, there've been, you know, just, we detail this in the article. So it would be better just to get the article and read it yourself.
HARDER: O.K.?
THOMPSON: And we cite our sources, too. So...
ROGER: I'd like to encourage when we have, that when we do have a rally or something around it...
HARDER: Yeah.
ROGER: ...that people would go ahead and come to the rallies. 'Cause I've been to some rallies recently and it's been very poor attendance. People just don't seem to wanna get out of their houses and do anything. They seem to be too scared, some of 'em.
THOMPSON: Well what good does a rally do? It exposes you, number one. It identifies you. Stop doin' that nonsense! The time is over for standin' out doin' talkin'. {2}. You need to be doing a lot more than talking. You need to be preparing. In your community, know your neighbors; know who they are. You know what needs to be done. Now do it.
HARDER: All right. We'll be right back with more. Don't go away, ladies and gentlemen. Linda Thompson is our guest.
[...commercial break...]
HARDER: We are back. And we're talking to Linda Thompson. And that said, let's go ahead and say, Linda, are you ready for another call?
THOMPSON: You betcha.
HARDER: All right. That... let's see here. Lemme push some buttons and bring in Palm Desert, California. "T.K.", go ahead.
TK: Hi Chuck. Nice to talk to you again. I'm a member and I admire what you're doing.
Question, Linda. With what's gone on and what the government has done -- the apparent overriding of the Constitution -- will there be any civil or criminal litigation brought against any of the participants, or the government itself, do you think?
THOMPSON: Well, at this point, yes. And will it be effective? No. We have lawsuits pending against the whole pile. And it was immediately transferred to Walter Smith in Waco. So it had to be dismissed and re-filed in Washington to get it away from him. But nonetheless, what is the potential for success in a case like that? Virtually none. You're suing the executive branch, essentially that's who's involved here. And who controls the courts? The executive branch. The court justices are appointed by the executive branch. They're paid by the executive branch. Uh they're... If they're not cooperative, what happens? Um, IRS is sicced on them. That's a good example. That's happened to numerous judges that have had the audacity to stand up to them.
HARDER: We know about that. {3}.
THOMPSON: Yeah. Well, you know, at this point the federal judicial system is completely rigged. So, in terms of publicity and letting people know that, yes, there is something wrong going on, and being able to get that picked up by mainstream papers, there's not a better way to do it than to sue 'em for a lot of money, get a little publicity from that that exposes the essence of what is wrong and why they're being sued. But in terms of winning, I doubt you could win it. Um, and I doubt if it would be effective.
TK: So. What happens in a society when you deprive people of their rights, and then you shut them out of the courts?
THOMPSON: Well, you can see what's happening. We have an economy that is collapsing around our ears. We have a population that is becoming more and more aware that the court systems are useless; that our congressmen are not responsive to us. I don't care what side of an issue you're on, if you've written to your congressman lately, if you got a response at all you got a boiler-plate little letter that says, "Thank you for your response," and basically, "Go away."
HARDER: "Have a nice day."
THOMPSON: "Have a nice day."
HARDER: Yeah.
THOMPSON: Um, we've gotten thousands of letters on Waco, copies of letters that people sent to their congressman. You can't turn on C-Span, with a talk show with a congressman, and not have somebody call in and go, "When are we gonna get a real investigation of Waco?" And yet you don't see any congressional committee doing a darn thing about it.
We already know these things. This is the point we are to now. We have a congress that is unresponsive. We have a judicial system that is unresponsive. We have an executive branch that is issuing executive orders left and right -- illegal executive orders {4} -- and running the country as a tyrannical kingdom, literally. That is what we have at this point.
(to be continued)
-----------------------<< Notes >>------------------------------- {1} For the People News Reporter (A Biweekly Newspaper) Subscription rates: 12 months (26 issues) $19 USA / $50 Overseas 3 River Street, White Springs, FL 32096 Visa/Mastercard: 1-800- 888-9999.
{2} "The time is over for standin' out doin' talkin'." I disagree. I think there hasn't been nearly enough "standin' out doin' talkin'." Thompson, for one, does not even follow her own advice. She has been consistently "standin' out doin' talkin'" and it's good that she has.
{3} Harder has had the IRS auditing him and his organization for a year. Harder says they are on a "fishing expedition."
{4} "...illegal executive orders..." Also, many of these executive orders are kept secret.
I encourage distribution of "Conspiracy Nation."
"Justice" = "Just us" = "History is written by the assassins."