("Quid coniuratio est?")
Opinions expressed do not necessarily reflect my own opinions nor the opinions of Conspiracy Nation.
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
From the suppressed airwaves of a frightened radio station
in Nashville, Tennessee: WWCR, 5065 Kilohertz, Shortwave:
INTELLIGENCE REPORT, (since silenced by Federal threat):
Part 2, 4/26, INTELLIGENCE REPORT on the Oklahoma City Bombing
TED GUNDERSON [retired F.B.I. official]: They [the technicians] said that if there is a forty-eight hundred pound fertilizer bomb, it takes more time to build up the shock wave. The pressure of the shock waves of a bomb of this type will build up to shatter windows and smaller objects, but it does NOT crush the pillars of the concrete structure.
Now, a high-"breisance" explosion is immediate, and it causes an immediate shattering of pillars, concrete, and high-density material.
JOHN STADTMILLER:
Now, when we first saw that .... By the way, Mark Koernke is on
the program with us.
TED GUNDERSON:
Hi, Mark.
MARK KOERNKE:
We're just listening. I'd like you to get everything out that
you can.
TED GUNDERSON:
It would be virtually impossible to control the direction of a
forty-eight hundred pound fertilizer bomb. A bomb the size of
a pineapple, wich is about two-by-nine [inches], and which
weighs about eleven pounds, which is a deadly bomb -- it is
very small, but it is very strong -- it would be very easy to
control the direction of that bomb.
Now, looking back at the scene [of the explosion], we notice that almost the total half of that building was destroyed immediately. And the building across the street [from it] was not destroyed, except for some windows being blown out.
But I think you brought up a very interesting point. The Government initially said, "a car bomb of a thousand or more pounds." And then they went up to, I think, "a pick-up truck or a panel truck." And then they went up to "a 24-foot rental truck," in order to make the damage coincide with the size of the vehicle, and, of course, [to coincide with] the bomb itself.
JOHN STADTMILLER:
Well, the one thing that struck me was that there was certainly
[garbled] any collateral damage. My first impression .... and I'm
not a demolitions expert, but the first impression that I got --
if you were to consider that building for a second as being
made out of clay -- it almost looked like it was sliced.
There was an explosion in that building, for sure, but it
looked like it was blown out, not from the gound up, because
if that were the case, using a device like that, there
would be a fluting effect [the cutting of parallel, vertical
grooves] on the building. But it would not cut from the bottom
floor all the way up to the ninth floor.
TED GUNDERSON:
I agree with you on that. Absolutely.
But the bottom line is that I don't think that we are being told
the truth about what happened back there [in Oklahoma City]
-- about the type of bomb, etcetera, etcetera.
(to be continued)
I urge you to post the episodes of this ongoing series to other
newsgroups, computer networks, computer bulletin boards and
computer mailing lists. It is also important to post hardcopies
on the bulletin boards of campuses, churches, supermarkets,
laundromats, etc. -- any place where concerned citizens can
read this vital information.
Our people's need for Paul Reveres and Ben Franklins is as
urgent today as it was 220 years ago.
I encourage distribution of "Conspiracy Nation."
Coming to you from Illinois -- "The Land of Skolnick"